In the first six months of this year, the Federal Government spent N2.02 trillion on debt servicing. This figure represents 90.58 per cent of the total revenue of 2,23 trillion generated by the FG within the period. Experts have therefore warned that this development signifies a dangerous trend for the economy.
The figure was disclosed by the Technical Adviser to the Director General of the Budget Office, Alfred Okon while presenting the “Overview of FGN 2022 Budget Call Circular” report on Thursday at a training on ‘Government Integrated Financial Management Information System Budget Preparation Subsystem for Ministries, Departments and Agencies.’
The report stated that as of June 2021, the Federal Government’s retained revenue was N2.23tn, which is 67.58 per cent of prorata target of N3.3tn for the review period. This means that the Federal Government failed to realise N1.07tn of its revenue target in the first half of the year.
The total revenue comprises oil revenue of N492.44bn, non-oil tax revenue of N778.18bn, Company Income Tax of N397.02bn, Value Added Tax of N129bn and Customs collections of N234.02bn. Other revenues amounted to N922.09bn, of which independent revenues accounted for N558.13bn.
Okon noted that the N2.02tn used to service debt in the first half of this year represented 35 per cent of total expenditure of N5.81tn.
The report said, “On the expenditure side, N5.81tn (representing 92.4 per cent of the prorated budget) has been spent. This excludes GOEs’ and project-tied debt expenditures; N2.02tn was for debt service (35% of FGN expenditures); and N1.79tn for personnel cost, including pensions (30.9 per cent of FGN revenues).”
It stated that as of August, N1.3tn had been released for capital expenditure, representing 22.3 per cent of total expenditure.
In his remarks, the DG, Budget Office, Ben Akabueze, reiterated the government’s commitment to ensuring the timely submission and approval of the 2022 budget. To achieve this, he said the government had already deployed a series of activities including engagements and stakeholder consultations.
Akabueze said, “Another key activity on the 2022 budget calendar is the training of MDAs’ personnel who will be involved in budget preparation.
“The main goal of this training is to provide continuous learning to equip budget personnel with the requisite knowledge, skills and the tools they require to prepare and submit the 2022 Budget in a timely manner.
“The budget is also intended to be in tandem with extant FGN policies and guidelines as articulated in the 2022 FGN Budget Call Circular and other relevant laws/policies.”
Reacting to enquiry by one of the correspondents on the debt servicing expense, a political economist and former presidential candidate, Prof. Pat Utomi, explained that the implication of the development was that the Federal Government borrowed to finance other expenditures that it incurred within the period. He added that the trend of continuous borrowing would further worsen the economic conditions of the country.
Utomi said, “The direct implication is that any additional money that the government spends is from additional borrowing; so what it means is that the borrowing will increase. And because I do not see any serious programme to trim or moderate expenditure, it means we are going to be borrowing to the quantum of our budget projections.
“We are in serious trouble in the country because our debt is not sustainable at the moment.
“This has been said time and time again; we shouldn’t be borrowing for consumption unless we see expanded taxes.”
He therefore urged the Federal Government to re-evaluate their borrowing approach by focusing foreign loans on developing value-adding assets instead of financing consumption.
Utomi said, “The FG needs to change the formulation for how we borrow. We should only borrow to develop value creating assets and those value creating assets should be managed the most efficiently by private sector hands, you can then tax the gains coming from those investments.
“That is really how you can pay off those debts, but when we are not focusing on production but are still looking to favour revenues, we plunge ourselves into huge problems of servicing the debt.”
A professor of economics at the University of Ibadan, Adeola Adenikinju, said, “The implication is, it will be hard for us to fund capital expenditure, for the government to spend on capital expenditure.
“If we are talking about growth, we need investments, government investment, especially in infrastructure, in social and economic services. If all our revenue is going to the servicing of debt, it means we have major fiscal problems which we need to solve.
“Another implication is we have to borrow to meet recurrent expenditure and any capital expenditure. We have to borrow through deficit financing, which an economist would know that depending on how you source for the deficit, it could be inflationary.
“It could also discourage private investment. It is not a good time for us as a country; we need to find a way of increasing our revenue base.”
The Chief Executive Officer of Financial Derivatives Company, Bismarck Rewane, also expressed worry over the nation’s debt servicing expenditure.
He said, “What we are paying as debt service is interest payment. Revenue is frail because of the pandemic, while debt service has increased. The debt service when translated into naira was much higher than anticipated.
“It is expected to improve with time. But it is worrying if we are spending so much on debt servicing without getting an increase in productivity, which is key.
“Productivity rates are low while debt servicing is increasing. Two things have to happen, revenue has to increase, and productivity must increase. That is critical.
“We are borrowing more, debt level is increasing, revenue has dropped because of the pandemic and all other things. We need to see an increase in revenue, in growth, employment and so many other things.”
President, Petroleum and Natural Gas Senior Staff Association of Nigeria, Mr Festus Osifo, said, “You cannot be comparing debt to GDP when you do not have revenue to service that debt. We should focus much more on debt to revenue because imagine for example next year, we would need N3tn to service our debt and at the end of the day, we can only generate N2.8tn, that means the debt is now 110 per cent of our revenue.
That is absurd. We should stop comparing our GDP and focus more on debt to revenue so that we would not be using our entire revenue to be servicing debt in such a way that the only way we can now finance our budget is by borrowing arbitrarily. When we do that, we are mortgaging our future and our children’s future as well.
We should be circumspect and careful with the way we borrow. Government should focus on how to attract investors into the country, on how to bring foreign direct investment and that is the only way we can get out of this quagmire.
The GDP released by the National Bureau of Statistics on Thursday states the GDP of the nation is about five relatively good per cent. We should think about how to grow our GDP by 10 per cent.
For us to start thinking of how to catch up with other parts of the world, our GDP must grow by double digits. That is the only way we can grow our infrastructure and our social amenities. Using 90 per cent of our revenue in servicing debt is not sustainable enough.”
Speaking on a personal level as Nigeria Labour Congress had not met to deliberate on the development, the Acting General Secretary, Nigeria Labour Congress, Mr Ismail Bello, said the impact of the debt burden was real as it hamstrung the capacity to grow the economy and create jobs.
The Programmes Coordinator, Social Action, a non-governmental organisation, Botti Isaac, admitted that spending 91 per cent of the nation’s revenue on debt servicing was a very dangerous trend for a nation.
He stated that the implication of this is that the nation is on the verge of bankruptcy and economic growth would be stagnant as government spending which was supposed to be the driver of economic activities would be drastically reduced.